Chapter 5: Three’s a Trap (Part 1)
One of the things Sean did was triangulate the heck out of me and his ex-wives. He wanted to enmesh me in his Sean-worshipping circus. This is all like a neon red flashing, Vegas-style red flag convention, but please remember he was already dissociating me and the best I could do was leave notes on things I noticed, I was so entranced, and subsequently scared of him, I would dissociate and fawn most of the time for the first year I knew him. Here is what he told me:
Ex-wife 3. Carole, baby mama #1, his middle school aged (at the time) daughters’ mother:
Said to have taken hundreds of thousands of “his deployment savings” from their joint account and transferred it to her father without his consent.
Said to have laughed at him during the divorce saying “i entrapped you,” by getting pregnant after he had said he does not want children and was told she was on birth control.
Filed for divorce immediately after becoming pregnant with second daughter, and told him via divorce papers.
She had a no-contact order in place after an altercation involving Sean and her dad. Counseling records show he was not allowed at his daughter’s first birthday party due to this restraining order.
Carole alleged serious harm toward their children; he responded by saying one child’s only phrase (repeated many times) during a formal interview about it was: “I love my daddy.” Over and over, this special forces veteran told me his toddler repeatedly said that one sentence during the entire interview, and it was that one.
Another time he explained that when Carole accused him of molesting the other daughter, his response was to blame it on a teen cousin’s involvement.
Said to have accused him, in court, of doing cocaine and seeing prostitutes in the home.
Claimed court records were sealed due to his classified military background.
Said when he got backpay for his VA disability, his lawyer drafted something for her to sign saying if she accepted $5000 she would forfeit a right to ask court to use any more of the $100,000 he got for child support. He surprised her with an offer for the $5000 in person, she signed, then still went to court to try to get more and was blocked.
Claimed he paid her $10,000 spousal support but not through the system, and then when he finished the terms from their divorce she went to the system and had them pull the amount from his checks because there was no record of his payments and he was supposed to have gone through the system.
She had a habit of getting upset that he didn’t send money or visit them (despite being retired,) and then within the same text string she’d lord it over them that he wasn’t “legally allowed to talk to them without her consent.”
She was given sole custody, he was given supervised visitation and possibly with her consent only, which she humiliated him for over and over during the course of the relationship I had with him. She loved that she got to decide.
Ex-wife 4. Ghislane, baby mama #2, his kindergarten/1st grade (at the time) sons mother:
Labeled disloyal and promiscuous.
Described as having “connections” and accused of manipulating systems.
Said to have reported him for kidnapping and rape, said to have directed SWAT to arrest him while his daughters were present. I saw papers to support this, showing that Carole was called to come retrieve the daughters while he was being arrested. He claimed he was nearly imprisoned for 80 years, but the charges first were said to “not have stuck,” then to have mysteriously disappeared through Ghislane’s “powerful influence.” And later, he said she retracted her statement.
He continued to refer to the home she lived in as “his,” five years later (this was another possible bribe to drop charges. He later demanded I retract my statement to police “like Ghislane did.”
Claimed she invented fake businesses and committed fraud to get leverage over him in court.
Said to have cheated on him in multiple states, on fake business trips, and with basically anything that had a penis and no integrity.
He claimed to have had 50% parenting time and claimed she was blocked from moving out of state with their son, she moved anyway, but had faked it, and was really in the area most of that time. I heard her and their son reference having moved to Florida (he would have been 3-5 during this time) and I also saw the home she was in had murals painted by Sean’s mother for the son that didn’t seem consistent with having rented it out while being gone.
Sean claimed that a time Ghislane filed for an order of protection she served Sean after his daughter’s 8th birthday party, he had to leave with his daughters, and that Ghislane stole every single one of the daughter’s birthday presents. That daughter (5 years later) mentioned this event the first time she saw Sean’s son in years. Poor girl.
Carole probably accepted the bribe, and Ghislane probably heard him talk about Carole’s bribe, and extorted him herself. She may have even provoked him to rage purposefully to gain enough leverage to take the house from him. He told me he gave her the house and it was “her idea,” but never in the context of extortion. It was in the context of generosity.
The end! Not really it gets much worse.
CVS CAREMARK. Brief Work History:
He seemed to have told mixed truths and lies about everything. For example, he claimed that after he went to college and landed a job at CVS Caremark corporate, he was excelling, said he was the only one in his group to get a raise. Then, he said he had to quit because someone approached him from behind, tapped him on the shoulder, and he reflexively body-slammed them, causing "the whole building to shake." He described how both he and the other man cried afterward, it was dramatic, almost cinematic the way he told it.
But later, when I read through his medical and employment records, I found a letter from his colleagues at that same job. It stated that he was essentially unable to perform his job duties, acted inappropriately, and consistently blamed others for his behavior. I had never heard any of that version of events before.
Still, the personality they described (petulant, bratty, entitled, emotionally regressed) is one I recognized. It’s the same age-regressed, sex-obsessed, impulsive state I witnessed many times. I’m assuming the “inappropriate behavior” referenced in the letter may have included sexual comments, though it could have been something else. He would consistently make comments that could be innocent, but weren’t, even around children, which I will detail in a future post. Either way, it was clear: the narrative he told me had been curated for sympathy. The records told a different story.
